Further observations about physics – split files

(23) Conundrums yet to address

The exact nature of the magnetic bubble crossover needs addressing. Is it two equally balanced bubbles or is it two adjacent bubbles? Are they in total unison or are they offset in some way? The "adjacency" becomes irrelevant as the bubbles expand massively (effectively becoming co-located) but the distance between the mouth and the exit of the wormhole tunnel probably dictates the apparent time separation between their respective mouths. This is really a Maxwellian distance that dictates the time interval bewteen the two mouths (how long light would take to travel between the two points without taking the wormhole shortcut).
What makes the antiverse (largely) invisible to us? Is it just the excess over the SoL that ensures it cannot interact/entangle with universal fermions? (We don't need to consider other particles if quarks are "in the tunnel" manifestations of first generation fermions.) We know that neutrinos are virtually invisible to us. As the entrance to the antiversal wormhole should be dominated by an antiversal Maxwellian SoL limit, and I have assumed that the universal SoL is equal and opposite (twice the SoL at crossover), it is perfectly possible that we run alongside a ghost universe that we barely interact with. Indeed, we have firm evidence for such ghosting with neutrinos.
Do second generation fermions occupy an extra dimension? Do they have three "sides" where electron-positrons have two? The latter satisfies our interpretation that we live in a 3-D universe. Do tau fermions have 5 sides? (This assumes that fermion generations go up by prime numbers – that is, there are no possible resonances, as would occur with 2 and 4.) And are there 7, 11, 13 etc fermions that are so improbable that we will not see evidence of them in our parish.
Is there any intrinsic reason that would prevent a positron being occasionally constructed on the universe side (and vice versa on the antiverse side for electrons)? I guess the answer is no – for an electron would have to balance it (either on our side or the other side) and, as we know, positrons don't last long before they are realeased as (a !!large amount!! of) pure radiant energy. Provided they are not moving in excess of the SoL they can live – transiently – on our side.
What is special about the SoL? Why could it not be a range of other values? It would be good if the value was thrown up by some inevitable bit of mathematics rather than what appears to be a random commitment.
Is the assumption that the antiverse is "running backward in time" something absolutely universal? The thinking here is that, if two entities are travelling away from each other at the SoL, they will see each other to be in their past. And this perception only lasts while the velocity of separation equals or exceeds the SoL. As the bubbles, on their largest scales, are located in the same place and, at their margins, they occupy an "all distance" and "no time" spacetime, the forward and backward in time bit is only relevant to the immediate surrounds of the wormhome entrances/exits. Further, it brings us back to the borrow/repay principle that we see in a sine wave. By imagining a second, contra-rotating, circle superimposed on the first, this becomes clearer. As the radii of the two circles map out their paths they concertina in and out across the x axis (as, by the way, do the stationary – all distance – top and bottom of the circle). It is this concertina motion that is rectified out to form the electron-positron pair from 2 "half spins". Thus, the universe "reality" is always the rectification of two waves (bubbles) into separated positive (expanding) and negative (contracting) entities. Each side will see a collapsing bubble on its own side but perceive its complementary "twin" to be expanding. As the fully expanded pair of bubbles will have lost the temporal component of their spacetime, they will look like persistent expanded bubbles and, at large scales, act as the stage for both universal and antiversal components to play out their antics.
.. pending ..
.. pending ..

Then, there are these pertinant quotes and the paraphrasing of one of them:–

Alice laughed.
"There's no use trying," she said. "One can't believe impossible things."
"I daresay you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was your age, I always did it for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."
[Through the looking glass" Lewis Carroll]

I will repeat, here, the two fun quotes from the earlier section "(07) Two fun quotes and more conjecture":–

"The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be."
[Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt: Hitchhiking the Galaxy One Last Time]

"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space."
[Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]

This last quote could be paraphrased thus:–

"The improbability that our universe would arise spontaneously from a rogue singularity, just by sheer chance, is big. You just won't believe how outlandishly, hugely, and mind-bogglingly improbable that is. I mean, you may think it's unlikely that you will win the National Lottery three times on the trot, but that would be just peanuts compared to the big bang."

"The difficulty in fine tuning the big bang and inflation so accurately, so that about 14 billion years later it hasnt gone just a teasnsy weansy bit off to one side or the other, is mind bogglingly precise. You would expect, for this, that someone has tuned the initial conditions to effect unbelievable accuracy."

"We are expected to believe that electromagnetic waves always travel at the same speed, whatever direction they are going (nb, speed not velocity - and that's a cop-out). When this is restated to "interacting electromagnetic waves always arrive and depart from matter (particularly electron shells) at the speed of light", we have a different perception of the process and we can even add a vector onto that speed and so turn it into a velocity." Admittedly, this constancy of the speed of electromagnetic waves is, indeed, what we measure but we only measure it by timing the departure from matter to the arrival at matter. Indeed, that's our only method of measuring it.