Further observations about physics – split files
(19) Is our universe/antiverse pair dominantly toroidal?
Electrons are dominant in our universe of leptons. So, whatever form the constituting photons take up in electrons/positron pairs should also dominate the universe/antiverse. I have suggested that the antiverse is probably a reflection of the universe.
The toroidal "shape" that I am going to talk about is a conceptual constriction of three distance dimensions (3D) represented by a single disc (2D) set of dimensions and the "tunnel" represents a time dimension. But it's a little more complicated than just linear time along the "tunnel". Anywhere around the centre of the "tunnel" (in a disc spreading out to "infinity") it is the rate of passage of time that is zero; and at the projected extremes of the tunnel axis (that are perpendicular to this central disc – imagine the disc has an extended axle), the rate of time passage is high. The direction of entropy is outward from the central disc; so time appears to run in the opposite direction either side of this central disc. In a time looped universe, the passage of time is at a virtual standstill in the centre of this "tunnel" (and in a disc encircling this centre (and separating the universal and antiversal sides). And, the passage if time is faster as we go out to "local" intergalactic space but should slow again as we approach deep intergalactic space – deep in the vast voids of space. You need to remember that there is a third distance dimension that cannot be easily shown on this schematic.
The lifetime of an electron is said to be "stable". The lifetime of a muon is about 2 x 10-6 seconds and of taus about 3 x 10-13 seconds. Now, I have already suggested that two "entangled" photons "dance" in a figure of 8 fashion to form an apparently separated electron/positron pair; the photonic oscillations are, effectively and dominantly, rectified to the universal side (electrons) and the anti-versal side (positrons). This is depicted in the figures in (17) More on rectification, "universe" and "antiverse". Anything "disappearing" down the vortex's mouth appears to be particulate (and that is what an electron is – it's the "rectified" shrinking photon part of this oscillatory dance). The hidden positronic part of this dance is "somewhere down the vortex" and out of interaction with the electron. I have already suggested that quarks are made up of "down the vortex mouth" lepton interactions; there is a perfectly balanced population of positrons on the anti-versal side that equals the electrons on the other side. So all leptons sit on one side or the other of a toroidal vortex. These vortices can vary in size from tiny (single electron/positron pairs) to gargantuan (as in black hole/white hole pairs).
As well as the size varying, the toroidal depth could vary, with short disc like toroids or extended tunnel like toroids. We understand this from entanglement experiments where the distance between entangled pairs can be short, or very long and even extended once entanglement is established. This process results in matter forming close to a constricting vortex mouth; The surrounding magnetosphere is formed by the expanding phase of this photon oscillation. The universal and the antiversal halves of the magnetosphere finally merge at its extremity where they could (truly) annihilate to zero energy. So, a universal/antiversal pair and all its constituent matter is overwhelmingly three dimensional.
But what happens to matter that contains muons and/or taus? I suspect that the constituent photons would (in a muon) "dance" around four dimensions (and 6 for taus if the critical lepton structure is dependent on prime numbers – as described earlier). However, this spatial form would have little influence on the far more abundant and stable 2-based prime (2 photon pair) leading to electron/positron dominance. This could help to explain why our universe appears to be overwhelmingly three dimensional. Higher dimensions would only appear in densely packed photon dances of these heavier leptons and their matching quarks. They would only "persist" to influence the surrounding universe when associated with hugely dense matter where time (to us) appears to slow towards stopping.