Further observations about physics – split files

(14) Rectification

I have found this diagram useful in visualising what may be happening and it can be "milked" for further insights.

Assumptions:

• A photon is a collapsing/expanding magnetosphere that "travels", in railway handcar fashion, through much larger (spatial) magnetospheres. (Keep in mind that it might be in one, two three or even more dimensions. I have assumed three for the moment.)
• Effectively, the magnetosphere is "pumped up" locally then squeezed out, toothpaste fashion, into to the next magnetosphere and does so, from our perspective, as an electrosphere (a "travelling electrically charged point").
• Initially, I will look at everything from a universal – rather than an antiversal – perspective but the inverted perspective always "travels" alongside.
• A collapsing magnetosphere is read by us as a negative "charge".
• An expanding magnetosphere is read by us as a positive charge.
• A single photon is "painted" onto a much larger "parent" magnetosphere.
• The sum of all the large and small magnetospheres (analogous to soap bubbles) defines the spatial extent of the universe. The largest ones exert the greatest influence on the grandest scale.
• Negative magnetic "charge" reduces the overall size of the "parent" magnetosphere whereas positive magnetic charge increases it.
• The maximum magnetic "charge" of an electron is its maximal (effective) potential-spatial-expansion. Potentially, this maxima could continue forever, never reaching zero, but its influence wanes in proportion to the energy invested in the photon.
• Magnetic lines of force, (analogous to the film of a soap bubble) are tangential to its spherical surface and act in a way that "attempts" to reduce the size of the magnetosphere.
• Electric charge arises at the point of maximal contraction and it lies at the crossover of positive to negative magnetic charge (for the -ve charge) and negative to positive magnetic charge (for the +ve charge).
• Electron/positron pairs are formed from two "entangled" photons that are contra-oscillating 180 degrees out of phase (in dumbell fashion with a forward in time and backward in time seesawing).
• These have a natural frequency of (apparent) oscillation that produces a sawtooth waveform "above" or "below" the crossover.
• Since the paired photon spheres oscillates "in and out", they can be seen to have a sawtooth-ve charge and a sawtooth +ve charge. These sawtooth oscillations are what (appear to us to) become electrons and positrons.
• The enlarging magnetosphere enlarges the "parent" magnetosphere and the contracting magnetosphere reduces the size of the "parent" magnetosphere – to a small but finite extent. Their +ve maxima and -ve maxima (minima if you prefer – but that could be confused with the central point location of the -ve or +ve fermion) are therefore displaced from one another.
• The paired photons exit from the "electron point" at the SoL (enlarging so fast that we don't appreciate them) and they dive into the "electron point" at the SoL (thus looking point like and very prolonged).
• The opposite (positronic) sawtooth enlarges to a greater maxima than the electronic one (from a universal – our – perspective). It's dive into the crossover point represents, to us, an enlarging magnetosphere and its exit, to us, represents a contracting magnetosphere BUT the crossover photons are moving at twice the SoL relative to each other, so they find it hard (effectively impossible) to interact with each other (if they did, they would be released as untangled photons – currently, and inappropriately, termed "annihilation").
• This results in the positron occupying the same "space" but appearing, to us, to be keeping pace with our expanding magnetosphere – so it has little or no charge and it moves outwards at the SoL where, at the electron "point" the sawtooth photons are diving in at the SoL; the differential is 2C (2 x SoL) – so they find it hard to interact. There are only rare and special circumstances under which an interaction takes place. A positron moving at somewhat greater than the speed of light appears to us to be a electron neutrino (to detect it through interaction with electron shells; it has to be close enough to the SoL for the odd favourable circumstance to unveil it).
• Although the negatronic and positronic sawtooth "dives" are at the same point (passage of time at a standstill from our perspective – because of the SoL) they apparently become rectified because the positrons in this entangled electron/positron pair cannot easily dock with an orbital electron "around" a matter (vs antimatter) atomic nucleus; they are moving (counter-oscillating) "too fast".
• However, electron and positron occupy the same "extra orbital" space around the (virtual?) nucleus.
• By this view, quarks are formed from electrons and positrons in the near-antiversal space or "within" it. Remembering that these occupy much the same "parent" magnetosphere – plus or minus a fraction of overall expansion and a fraction of overall contraction.
• So, that neatly explains the 2 x ¹/₂c² of Einstein's exchangeability of energy and matter.
• So where does the m (mass) come from?
• I have a suspicion that mass comes from the tendency, inherent in the property of the negative magnetosphere (paired with diving positrons) being apparently larger than the positive magnetosphere (paired with diving electrons); so it exerts a "magneto/electric" restitution force (or more accurately, an accelerating force exerted by the entangled antiversal expansion). Of course, the scenario will look inverted looking from a positronic atomic-shelled antiverse. The greater the energy gap from negatronic to positronic sawteeth. The greater the mass. So, it's lowest in a solitary photon; it's next lowest in isolated hydrogen atom and greatest across the event horizon of a black hole (with all the intermediates filling in). That means that it is the strength of the entanglement that is crucial.
• This sawtooth pattern of rectification suggests how two electrons are able to occupy one orbital. Repulsion occurs when either the constituent photons are expanding (either universally or antiversally). However, there is a possibility for two electrons to occupy the same space if they have a perfectly matched frequency and their phases overlap appropriately (perhaps also horizontal/vertical polarisations are opposite - so disk like expansions rather than spherical). Hhhmmm – maybe this could work.
• The diagrams below outlines how I suspect the universe/antiverse "works". At its simplest, are the basic componet electron/positron pairs (EP-pairs). Two contra-oscillating, entangled photons create an EP-pair. Unless there is some rectifying condition to prolong the persistence of transitory EP-pairs, they will quickly "evaporate"/"disentangle" back into their constituent photons that are then freed to wander off on their own. The circumstances leading to "rectification" and separation of the EP-pair may well be dependant on the property that the e^--ring is expressed by a contracting (at the SoL) sawtooth of the photon pair and the e⁺-ring by an expanding sawtooth (from our perspective – of course, the antiversal viewpoint is reversed).
• The upper diagram is the overview perspective, with the photon pair's expansion/contraction being a loop and "time" appearing to go backwards and forwards (as in a sine wave) around the oscillatory cycle. On the left hand ("Universal") side, time effectively approximates distance (as in, "one second is equivalent to and interchangable with 300,000 km)".
• On the right hand (Antiversal) side, from our perspective, distance turns into time alone. Each photon of the contra-oscillating photon pair (180 degrees out of phase) occupies the same position as its opposite ring or shell, as it becomes when merging around an atom; that is, it's the same apart from some cycling elongation due to the e⁺-ring lagging slightly behind the e^--ring (due to our motion around the galactic centre. So, each point on the Antiversal side, will lie in the same space as the Universal equivalent (time "running" backwards) even though they find it hard to interact (viz, neutrinos). This means that, at the e^--ring, which approximates to a surface area of 4πr², the whole outer volume of the Antiversal pair (⁴/₃πr³) will appear to be flattened onto the respective e^--ring. That should apply to each electron shell in an atom so the balancing ratio of charge becomes 1:3, at the Universal:Antiversal crossover. I'm ignoring the absence of perfectly spherical shells here but I suspect it will probably apply. This clearly needs more thought.
• This torus scheme applies to single electrons, electron pairs in individual shells around an atom, agglomerations of matter (eg, in a planet) and, ultimately in black holes. In the latter, the crossover from distance to time becomes much more extreme. Here the temporal distance "inside" the black hole can equate to the physical distance to deep intergalctic voids (the spacetime balance goes from appearing to be dominantly space to appearing to be dominantly time). The whole "structure" suggests that, at the moment distance is (apparently) converted to time (the mid point) the centre points of mass of atoms, bodies, planets, stars and black holes are effectively foreshortened and act as if they lie closer together than we interpret the situation. (This is primordial in concept at the moment.)
• The second diagram is a closer representation of the torus throat. Bear in mind that the x-axis only represents the passage of time, with the centre line indicating a change from forward to backwards. The physical location is better represent by folding the right hand over to lie on the left. The constituent photons of an EP-pair counter-oscillate in the same space but the components on the Universal side finds it hard to interact with those on the Antiversal side (as in, "it takes a light year's depth of solid lead to block half the neutrinos travelling through it").
• If we go back to the point that a collapsing magnetosphere appears as a negative charge (for universal beings) and expanding magnetosphere appears as a positive "charge", then the zero charge of a neutrino could be, in some way, related to this. (Needs thought.) Or it could simply be that most neutrinos travel well in excess of the SoL, and so cannot leave or enter an electron shell (all our measuring instruments depend on this ability). The few neutrinos that travel close enough to the SoL may be the only ones that we can detect. That might infer that neutrinos detected from stellar explosions arrive a minute fraction before photons – look out for that possibility.
• Just look back to Figures 3 and 4 in (01) Introductory remarks and think where, in this (succession of time wells, heavy neutrinos will arise and appear to decay (backwards in time) into electron neutrinos. It will be at both deep ends of the time wells with neutrinos being more populous in deep intergalactic space due to the decay of heavy neutrinos (muon and tau). Should there be more generations of fermions (beyond tau – as I have surmised) then they are most likely to "emanate" from the deepest time wells (eg, neutron stars). Planet Earth may be incapable of slowing time enough to allow heavier fermions to persist in our parish.
• One last point, now, about "what is a photon?" On this newer perception it is "whipped" packet of energy that travels along the entanglement of one atomic shell to another. For an electron to escape an atomic shell (at the SoL) it most probably possesses a destination (entangled) partner to which it will eventually "dock" (at the SoL). Time, for this entanglement, is not confined to the 1900-2000 time direction. Instead, I suspect that it is bidirectional and, ultimately, timeless (any forwards time "move" must ultimately be balenced by an identical backwards in time "move".

I am sure that this is all too naïve, but it's a potential start.